Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. Your application is assessed by peer review. EPSRC wants to support early career researchers to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas. Your comments, scores and confidence level should explicitly reflect your views on those aspects you can assess, and you are asked not to moderate these in any way to reflect those areas you feel you cannot comment on. Designing and developing new in situ synchrotron experiments in collaboration with central facility scientists, including the drafting of . When applying: Select 'documents', then 'new document'. Where the applicants have ticked any boxes confirming that the application involves either animal research or human participation, then you are asked to comment specifically on any ethical considerations and particularly on whether ethical approval procedures have been complied with. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. The following information takes an ESRC Standard Grant application as a template but the information is also applicable to other funders. This makes it easier for the panel to assess how complete and convincing the applicants responses are. This should reflect your overall conclusion, and should be consistent with your comments on the individual sections of your review, taking account of all the assessment criteria and the various weightings you applied. The New Investigator Award scheme will. You will not be able to apply after this time until the opportunity reopens on the Funding Service in May 2023. Advice on writing proposals for EPSRC funding. Investigate high-priority use cases for exascale software - deadline 28th September 2021 (restrictions apply) Establish an international network in quantum technologies - deadline 30th September 2021. You should ensure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines that may be in place. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. Read about support available on EPSRC grants for people with caring responsibilities. You are asked throughout to assess the application but be clear that this means the ideas, concepts and approaches contained therein, and not the specific form of the document itself. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. Please select the Lead Agency agreement under which you wish to apply. Co-Is and PDRAs are permitted. Encourage a greater degree of university support to aid career development. A Publication of the . For example: applicant is on maternity leave until a certain . Proposed collaborations for this open funding route may involve international research partners from any country, this can include researchers in 1 or more lower middle income, low income, or least developed countries on the Development Assistance Committee list, where the focus of the research is outside the official development assistance compliance criteria. whether the proposal demonstrates that the applicants have the expertise and capabilities to deliver the project. You can request funds for anything eligible under standard EPSRC rules. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. This question requires an answer. . Guidance on completing ethical information on the Je-S form. Last updated on 2023/02/23 In some instances, the case for support may include a link to a web site containing information on the research proposed. I lead the Adaptus Research Group, established to realise adaptive ultrasonics and systems for intelligent medical and industrial technologies. case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit. Applicants must comply with the standard EPSRC terms for eligibility to hold research grants . This funding opportunity is only open to early career researchers who meet the eligibility requirements of EPSRC's New Investigator Award scheme. Research has the ability to not only produce understanding, knowledge and value, but also unintended consequences, questions, ethical dilemmas and, at times, unexpected social transformations. Finally the presentation will ask how organisations such as FIG and ISPRS can play a part in these developments. For example, controlled sequences of cells in droplets with varied volumes is desirable in multi-volume droplet digital polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) for accurate detection of genetic information in cells. All relevant parts of the ethical information section must be completed. If you have a concern that the application raises ethical issues that have not been clearly identified or addressed, you should raise this directly with EPSRC, which will need to make a policy decision on how the application should be treated. The six levels of the scoring scale are as follows. Select 'call search'. Case for support. This helps reviewers make informed judgements about whether the resources requested are appropriate for the research proposed. We would expect this to form part of the university support letter. The case for support should describe the proposed research and its intended outcomes. This award enables researchers to develop flexible, creative and tailored approaches to increase the impact of their research by building new or developing existing partnerships locally and across the . whether the research programme and associated impact activities have been co-designed with external stakeholders or users: Does the proposal include objectives for impact related activities and are they appropriate to the research? The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . You must apply using the Joint Electronic Submission (Je-S) system. whether the applicant has identified potential stakeholders and stated the relevance and possible benefits to the stakeholders. When you apply for funding, you fill in an application form on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system and attach certain documentation. EPSRC New Investigator Award for Dr Meghan Halse. This letter will only be seen by EPSRC and will not be sent to peer review. Where known impacts have occurred, these should have been highlighted in the application, including the assumptions and information at the point of submission. acknowledges support from EPSRC New Investigator Award (grant ref. Proposals may build directly on prior work or may involve a speculative leap forward. Any investigators who do not have a Je-S account must register for one at least 7 working days before the opportunity deadline. As with all EPSRC grants, applicants should request the appropriate suite of resources to carry out the proposed research. Find out more about completing your application. Graduated with a PhD in Mathematics from UCL in 2014, and a Master's in Physics from the University of Hamburg, Germany. The applicant should have provided appropriate methodology to deliver the research and impact programme. If youre applying through the New Investigator Award scheme, you should attach a statement from your host university, typically your head of department describe the universitys commitment to your research career development, and confirm your appointment details and period of probation if relevant. https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-reviewers/peer-reviews/reviewer-forms-and-guidance-notes/new-investigator-award, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Download the New Investigator peer review form, San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, part-time working for the principal investigator, co-investigators, post-doctoral research assistants, technicians or wider team costed on a grant, support for costs over and above standard care arrangements to allow the principal investigator or their team to attend activities associated with the grant (for example conferences) where costs cannot be met by the employer. Multiple periods of PDRA supervision are likely to be considered holistically in terms of the skills the candidate has had the opportunity to develop, to avoid duplicating the aims of the NIA. Work in collaboration with . Apply for funding to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas and to tackle the challenges faced by developing countries.. They should be read in conjunction with the reviewer principles. This is mainly assured by requiring that universities have in place and operate appropriate ethical approval processes. The Vice Chancellor's Fellow at the School of Chemistry of the University of Bristol, has won an EPSRC New Investigator Award worth 392,000. Other issues you might also comment on are the uniqueness (or otherwise) of the collaboration, the value of the contribution of the component you can judge, and the significance of this in terms of future potential development in your own field. Office of Research Development and Education (ORDE) in the . The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. This occurs when an organisation cannot be listed as a project partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment. We expect the level of funding to vary but be appropriate to the proposed research programme. Reviewers are requested to comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management making reference to equipment and resources as follows: You should draw attention to any request that in your view has not been justified or, conversely, if something is required but has not been identified. For more information see host organisation statement for New Investigator Award. whether the roles and responsibilities of all members of the team have been defined, including those of users or stakeholders in both research and impact activities. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. The applicant could present a programme where they are moving into a new discipline, or the programme could bring together expertise and approaches from different disciplines, and in partnership with external organisations. For more information, see guidance on what makes a good project partner letter of support. applicant is on maternity leave until a certain date, additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the track record, conflict of interest for EPSRC to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection. Dr Meghan Halse has been awarded 210,439 from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) to support research on "Lighting up Magnetic Resonance: SABRE optimisation powered by in situ detection". Note that the existence of competing groups elsewhere should not of itself be seen as a reason for downgrading a proposal. For the New Investigator Award the proposal cover letter should describe how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance. You will have a chance to provide a response to the assessment, which will be considered in the ranking of the proposal. Your host organisation will also be able to provide advice and guidance. Proposals are considered in competition with other NIAs at standard research prioritisation panels. The UK is at the forefront of addressing global societal and economic challenges that have engineering and physical sciences at the heart, including climate change, cyber security and long-term sustainable growth. The ESRC New Investigators Grant is a relatively new scheme for early career researchers who want to become a principal investigator (PI) and work on an independent piece of research. The New Investigator Award scheme is intended to support individuals who hold an academic lectureship position, and have not previously led a research group. Can be applied for without holding an academic position. Normally you might expect to see a plausible hypothesis with some basis within the published literature, and some clearly identified objectives that sensibly test that hypothesis. For sensitive information the applicant should state clearly whether the information is confidential. Therefore, you should not use journal impact factor (or any hierarchy of journals), conference rankings and metrics such as the H-index or i10-index when assessing UKRI grants. Your project should typically last one to three years. The new investigator award is for people who hold an academic lectureship position at UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations and NHS bodies, and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. Find out more about what to include in the case for support. Sample Resume For Tile Business Owner, Curriculum Vitae De Cuitlahuac Garcia Jimenez, About A Boy Help Essay, Sample B E Cse Resume, Examples Writing Methodology . The response must be a maximum of 2 pages. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate to the new investigator award. This must be attached, as a single document, using the Case for Support attachment type in Je-S, justification of resources up to two A4 sides, CVs, up to two A4 sides each, for named research staff (including researcher co-investigators), or visiting researchers. The proposal, reviewers comments and your response will then go to a panel that will score it against our assessment criteria and rank it with other new investigator proposals. Centre for Research on Evolution, Search and Testing (CREST) Requests for travel both domestically and internationally could be included in accordance with the relevant scheme guidelines, noting the above advice. https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-applicants/types-of-funding-we-offer/new-investigator-award, Contacts for the New Investigator Award scheme, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). As part of this, any private, personal or commercial interests relating to an application for funding to the research councils must be declared in a covering letter included as an application attachment.
